Friday, May 17, 2019

Semester II Final

Semester II Final
By Adam Tyler
Part A: 1-8

1. Before doing any research, I predict the three most highly ranked presidents in US history will be Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, and Ronald Reagan, and the worst might be Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Richard Nixon.

2. On the C-SPAN survey of presidential leadership, Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Theodore Roosevelt have been consistently viewed as the top four presidents. Harry S. Truman has gone back and forth in the 5th spot, while Theodore Roosevelt has gone back and forth in the 4th spot.

3. On the C-SPAN survey page, I notice that in the worst 10 presidents, a majority of them have become ranked lower on the list in 2017. This is probably because America's standards have been getting lower as we get worse presidents, so now the presidents are ranked even lower. The top 10 presidents have varied a lot, but mostly in 2009, they're ranked a little bit higher than they were in 2008. I think this is because people begin to look back at them more and realize how truly good presidents they were in that year. I also realize that at the end of the list, there are a lot of forgettable presidents like Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan. They are probably ranked so low down there because people have become more critical of the presidency since then and have decided that they didn't really do anything.

4. The participants in the C-SPAN survey are seemingly all universities or colleges. I think C-SPAN included them in this survey because they think they can get reliable information out of them, since these people went to college, like Purdue University or George Mason. If these names weren't here, I may ask if this is a reliable source or not, but since these names are from college, there's a pretty good chance it is a reliable source. If someone went to Duke College or Harvard Law School, I'd probably trust them to give me accurate information.

5. The 10 qualities presidents were ranked on were crisis leadership, moral authority, wanted equal justice for all, economic management, administrative skills, performance in context of times, making a plan, relationship with the the public, relationship with the Congress, and relationship with other governments.

6. From how the presidents are ranked and what they are ranked on, I think that the categories C-SPAN weights heavily on are crisis leadership, moral authority, and administrative skills, since many of the top ten presidents were still the top ten in these categories.

7. If I was ranking the presidents based on the ten categories, the top three categories that would be the most important would be relationship with the public (because everyone needs to know what the president is doing because he's our trusted leader), vision (because a president must decide what he will do differently that will bring hope to America), and wanted equal justice for all (because if we don't have justice, then America is a big, fat fraud of a country).

8. My predictions of best presidents were mostly accurate while my predictions of worst presidents were greatly flawed. On the list, Abraham Lincoln was first, George Washington was second, and Franklin D. Roosevelt was third. I may have placed Ronald Reagan in third just because I heard a whole lot of good stuff about him from my family. The worst presidents were from worst to less worse, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, and Franklin Pierce. These presidents weren't even close to the ones I thought of, probably because I forgot all about the presidents and didn't even know there was a guy named Franklin Pierce. I currently think of Richard Nixon with the Watergate Scandal, Bill Clinton with his affair, and George W. Bush just being kinda stupid in office, but I don't really know those worst presidents so I'm assuming they weren't useful and didn't do almost anything good in office.

Part B: 9-10

9. "On March 16 we celebrate the anniversary of James Madison's birthday. Madison, traditionally viewed as the Father of the United States Constitution, is also seen by many as a defender of open government. He once wrote, "[a] popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps, both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives."1
 (Links to an external site.) In a similar vein, he asserted that "the advancement and diffusion of knowledge" is "the only Guardian of true liberty." Justice.gov.
"We rejoice the day of birth of James Madison, for it is March 16. He is observed as a protector of the  system we have and the founder of its laws. "A system without having received good resources is the beginning to a fake or bad event or the two of them together. Idiocy will be less than wisdom. Folks who want to be rulers of themselves, beware that they have a big burden to carry of the wisdom they receive. Like this, Madison said "the evolution and enlightenment of wisdom" is "the one thing that will keep justice safe."

10. " . . . [K]nowledge of our own history is essential in the making of Americans. The reasons for this belief may be summed up under four main heads. History makes loyal citizens because memories of common experiences and common aspirations are essential ingredients in patriotism. History makes intelligent voters because sound decisions about present problems must be based on knowledge of the past. History makes good neighbors because it teaches tolerance of individual differences and appreciation of varied abilities and interests. History makes stable, well-rounded individuals because it gives them a start toward understanding the pattern of society and toward enjoying the artistic and intellectual productions of the past. It gives long views, a perspective, a measure of what is permanent in a nation’s life. " American Historical Association.

 The quotes said by James Madison and the American Historical Association are very similar yet also different. Both discuss knowledge and how important it is and that it is power. However, Madison associates knowledge with the government and how being the government requires a whole lot of knowledge, especially if you're your own governor. The American Historical Association associates knowledge with history and how it creates people with knowledge which can lead to understanding of patriotism. Although, both are talking about authority in America, whether you feel needed to be a patriot or a governor.

 I think that these two quotes are definitely true in most perspectives. I do agree that knowledge is power and that to be a big shot in your country, you definitely have to have it. However, I somewhat disagree with James Madison when he says that knowledge will overrule ignorance. That has not always been true in America. People can be so stupid that when they know what they're doing is wrong, they do it anyway, like Richard Nixon when he committed the Watergate Scandal and shoved the thought of it being bad into the back of his mind. However, I do find Madison's overall statement about knowledge needed during times of government true since it might be the only way you'll survive in the government. I also agree with the American Historical Association that knowledge of history will make us Americans, because our past shapes us into what we are now.

Part C: 11-15

11. I would say I have definitely grown as a researcher this year. I have learned to paraphrase paragraphs (just like I did above), I have learned to hyperlink my sources underneath a picture to where I got the information from, and I have learned to use sources with reliable authors (like someone from a university or a historian). I used to not really understand how paraphrasing worked, but now I understand that it is replacing about every word in the paragraph but still meaning the same thing. I learn hyperlinking is copying a source and pasting it under the picture (it's really that simple). Also, from looking at who wrote the article, I should determine if the information matches true information from a reliable author.

12. Looking back at my film project, the five parts I was most proud of was my entire menu, because it took me almost two hours to find everything on the menu and I liked how I used several metaphors to explain the choices; the Watergate tapes, because for some reason I really liked that image of three tapes in cases that had impeached Nixon and it was probably my best artifact in the museum; the invitation, because I've never made an invitation before ever and it looked kinda nice; the interview room, because it was the hardest image to find and I finally put it in the exhibit; and the middle paragraph of my Frost/Nixon essay, because the part where I mentioned that the events of the Watergate Scandal weren't really talked about much in the movie is probably the strongest part of my essay.

13. A blog post I liked from my class was John Calvin's blog post titled 2.9 Mass Incarceration. The essay talked about the issue of mass incarceration and how it is mainly the result of racial bias. Most people today seem to have stopped being racist, but there a plenty who still are. Blacks are treated the most poorly in prison and make up of 40% of the inmates. Even black kids make up for a majority in the juvenile prison. I liked this post mainly because it shows me that the world can still be major jerks about race and that we may not have really changed. Also, another reason I like it is because more and more people get sent to jail every year and that there's really not a whole lot of space left in prisons for them. I think that says a lot about today's society, like how many people have turned to crime or how many officials have become corrupt. JC also really makes a good point when he tells the reader that white people and black people need to work more closely together to solve the problem of mass incarceration. I think that that would actually help stop the problem.

14. "The best way to predict your future is to create it.” Abraham Lincoln. I chose this quote from Abraham Lincoln because I think it is very helpful advice. Lincoln says that instead of worrying about what your future might be like, to just focus on the now and that way you can pave the future you want. I sometimes get worried about what's gonna happen to myself in the future, if I become a success or not, but now I realize that the future can be what you make it if you just stop worrying about it since the present can become your future.

15. 

A picture of Sitting Bull, an Indian chief. He refused to move off his property that the Americans attempted to claim. Many Indians thought he was crazy to go through with it, but at the same time, respected him for it. His face brings hope for the Indians that they one day may be treated right by America. Even though they are gone now, America has attempted to become a better place by treating black people better.
The paper in which Lincoln was announced to be assassinated. This marked the end of the best president ever and an end to the best presidents.
A depiction of George Washington crossing the Delaware River with company. This was a pivotal moment in history as Washington stands proud and triumphant over the river as hope went up that Washington would be a great leader and would win the war, officially becoming the first president of the United States of America, and starting off America's history.





























Friday, April 26, 2019

In-Class Write

Frost/Nixon Essay
Adam Tyler

 For someone wishing to learn about the tv news industry in a fun and exciting way, I would definitely choose Frost/Nixon. In this movie, you can learn various things about the conflict as David Frost interviews Richard Nixon. David Frost interviewing Richard Nixon was one of the most surprising events in the late 70s. From the movie directed by Ron Howard, people can see the explosive interview, but can also see more clearly what led to the interview and what happened after it. In the movie, David Frost starts out as a television show host, but he wants to be more than just being remembered as a tv host and wants some actual recognition, so he attempts to interview Richard Nixon with help from BBC's director general John Birt, reporter Bob Zelnick, and news writer James Reston Jr. However, Nixon wants to re-ignite his reputation after he was confirmed to be in the Watergate Scandal, so he accepts the interview, especially since he'll be receiving a lot of money from it. From this direction, the audience can see that both are after the same thing, fame and fortune, which is what Frost and Nixon wanted in real life.

From this movie, the audience can see Frost and Nixon then preparing for their big interview. They can realize how hard both have been studying to take each other down and feel somewhat sympathetic for them. Soon enough when the final confrontation comes, the audience can see that there was a whole lot of tension on the set of the interview, including Nixon even shouting this when Frost tries to tell him no one is above the law, “When the president does it, that means it’s not illegal!”, which is not really true at all. Then, Frank Langello does a stunning job acting as Richard Nixon when he finally admits to the Watergate Scandal, “I let the American people down.” Right there, people can learn that even the president can do wrong and bad things. Both in the film and in real life, Nixon admitted this and he remained low in his San Clemente house for the rest of his life while Frost finally got the fame he wanted and became a well-respected celebrity. For anyone who was thinking that the president always knows best, you were wrong. This movie shows the real-life events that an underdog reporter brought the president down, and it was a pivotal moment in history.

Although you can learn a lot fromFrost/Nixon, like the riveting interview and its prologue and aftermath, one thing you may not learn about is the whole Watergate Scandal. The film only briefly circles around why Nixon was in the scandal, not what it actually was, so the audience may not get a full explanation of what he did, which is very important for a movie like this. The Watergate Scandal happened on June 17, 1972 when some men were caught breaking in. It was later found out that they had ties to the presidential administration of Nixon. Although Nixon denied any involvement in the trial, he was soon found out to be a big fat liar when it was discovered that he had recorded an important conversation he had with HR Haldeman, the chief of staff at the White House. The tape called “The Smoking Peanut” proved Nixon was guilty, yet people weren’t sure how to convict a president, so Nixon voluntarily left the presidency while his Vice President Gerald Force pardoned him for the crime. Yet, a whole lot of people were infuriated.

Another aspect that the audience won’t learn all the pressure Frost was under from other people besides his interviewing team. The audience doesn’t even hear or see anyone criticizing Frost about interviewing Nixon. A lot of people thought he couldn’t do it, even Frost himself thought he couldn’t, but in the movie it seems as if no one even bothers. In real life, this made the stakes even higher as he would be remembered as a failure and an embarrassment to tv news and he would probably never hear the end of it. In the movie Frost is afraid of losing everything to this interview, but the movie forgets how other people will see him if he loses and that he is now not on tv.

If someone should add in an extra 20 minutes to the movie without worrying about losing the audience’s attention, I recommend adding 20 minutes about the side characters’ lives. Even though the movie is titled Frost/Nixon, Ron Howard spends very little time on the more amusing and interesting John Birt, Bob Zelnick, and James Reston Jr. In the movie, they are shown as somewhat of a comic relief, while they definitely worked hard in real life. The stakes are very high for David Frost and Richard Nixon since they could lose their reputation, their job, or even their wealth. However, the movie doesn’t focus very closely on what was at stake for these three. Only John Birt had a family and he could’ve lost his job if the interview went badly, but we don’t get the same type of drama we see with Frost and Nixon. If 20 minutes were devoted to these side characters in the middle of the movie when they were working on the actual interview and discussing how they could tear down Nixon, it could help the audience care for the characters more since they were important too. 

Annotated Sources

Sources:


ABC CLIO: American History. "Watergate Scandal." Information on the Watergate break-in and Nixon's involvement with it.


Richard Nixon: Presidential Library and Muse. "President Nixon." Biography and legacy of Richard Nixon's life.

National Archives. "Memorandum From Feldbaum and Kreindler to Jarwoski: Watergate Special Prosecution Force." Documents of whether or whether not to have Nixon prosecuted for Watergate Scandal.

Watergate.info. ""Transcript of the "Smoking Gun" Tape: June 23,19." The transcript of Richard Nixon talking to HR Haldeman over control of FBI on Watergate Scandal.

The New York Times. "Transcript of Frost's Television Interview." The transcript of David Frost's interview of Richard Nixon.

Empire. "Frost/Nixon Review." Review of Frost/Nixon.

RogerEbert.com. "Frost/Nixon Review and Film Summary (2008)." Review and critical perspective of Frost/Nixon.

The Guardian. "Frost/Nixon." Critical perspective and review of Frost/Nixon.







Menu

David Frost vs. Richard Nixon
Exhibit Menu

Beverage:
Sweet Tea
This drink tastes sweet, but it definitely has a sour aftertaste, but you can definitely handle it. Richard Nixon was at first winning the interviews with David Frost with ease, but near the end, he lost dearly. However, he found a way to live with it.

Appetizer:
Pigs in a Blanket
An appeasing delicacy that feature, small hot dogs trapped in bread. This is similar to how Richard Nixon had wrapped up David Frost in the interviews, until Frost became the bread and Nixon became the hot dog.

Main Course:

Cheeseburger
A delicious food that Richard Nixon can no longer have. Instead, he has to eat "Hawaiian burgers", that he say don't taste like hamburgers. He really wants them, just like acceptance and respect from the American people, but he can't have it.

Side:
Potato Chips
This side will not let you stop eating, even if it is a little unhealthy. Richard Nixon will not let his secrets be exposed and he's eating up the interview with David Frost. Eventually, he's had enough and can't go on holding in his secrets.

Dessert
Trifle
A bowl of tasty looking cherries on top of several layers. As you go through each layer, you start to know what the flavor is. When David Frost started to go through Richard Nixon, he started to discover his secrets.

Exhibit

David Frost/Richard Nixon
Exhibit

Frost vs. Nixon Interview Picture
A photo of David Frost interviewing ex-President Richard Nixon. A historic scene where Mr. Frost convinced Nixon to admit to being involved with the Watergate Scandal and apologize to all Americans.

Watergate Tapes
Three tapes that recorded and confirmed Nixon's role in the Watergate Scandal, which forced him to resign from presidency. This was pivotal for Frost's win when he asked Nixon why he didn't burn the tapes.
Transcript of Frost/Nixon Interview
The official transcript of Frost's interview with Nixon. One of the most shocking and intense interviews in history, which officially made Frost's career and left Nixon in recluse.

The Western White House
A picture of Richard Nixon's home in San Clemente, California. Also known as the Western White House, this is where David Frost met Richard Nixon and officially agreed to do an interview. It also became Nixon's real home after the interviews were over and he was disgraced.
Frost/Nixon Interviews from TV Guide
A promotion for TV Guide now showing the Frost/Nixon interviews. They were one of the few magazines to have articles about the interviews, alongside Time and Newsweek in 1977.
The Interview Room
The living room of the home in Monarch Bay that Frost interviewed Nixon. The taping of the interviews lasted approximately 28 hours and 45 minutes. Harold and Martha Lee Smith, the owners, were in favor of Nixon.

David Frost's Italian Shoe
The shoes David Frost wore to the interviews. Nixon attempted to play "mind games" with Frost by calling his shoes "effeminate" to make him nervous. Ironically, many Italian shoes are thought to be high in quality.
Frost/Nixon Interview Tapes
The actual tapes of the charismatic and flamboyant David Frost interviewing the gruff and no-nonsense ex-President Richard Nixon. It was officially released on January 1, 1977.


Invitation



GUEST LIST

Ron Howard- director of the 2008 movie Frost/Nixon in which David Frost gets Richard Nixon to apologize. By seeing the exhibit, Howard can see how well the historical accuracy of the movie was, so he'll know he did well with his work.

Michael Sheen- actor who played David Frost in the movie. The exhibit could show him how well he did portraying David Frost in the movie and I think he will be excited to see it.

Frank Langella- actor who played Richard Nixon in the movie. The exhibit could show him how big of a character he played in the movie, even if the movie mostly circled Sheen as Frost. He will be delighted to find an exhibit made from a real event that had its own movie, that he co-starred in.

David Frost- the man himself, the one man who interviewed Nixon and got him to apologize. He will be amazed that this exhibit was based off him interviewing Nixon and remember what a legacy he really had.

Bob Zelnick- an experienced producer who helped produce the makings of Frost's interview with Nixon. Seeing the exhibit will remind him that his producing skills brought down the president for good.

James Reston Jr- a humorous researcher who helped Frost prepare to "interrogate" Nixon by giving him his lines to say. The exhibit will show Frost uttering his words in one part, reminding Reston how good at creating monologue he was.

Michael Kroenwetter- a freelance writer who wrote an article on the Watergate Scandal. This article stood out to me the most because it gave up a lot of information. By inviting him to the exhibit, Kroenwetter could document the exhibit's artifacts and even write an article about the exhibit.

Philip French- a very professional movie critic who wrote a review on Frost/Nixon. Having him see the exhibit could cause him to see the movie differently and portray the movie as having more historical accuracy.

Monday, April 15, 2019

2.10 Thinking Like a Historian

2.10
Thinking Like a Historian
Adam Tyler

Fighting for black power

From the topic civil rights and black power, about 4-6 documents below show the range of perspectives and ideas with the struggle for civil rights in the 1960s. Many peaceful protesters were unfortunately met with police brutality, however some were met with attempted negotiations, however these "negotiations" usually didn't last and many demands still stood.